Monika Beňová
SMER-SD
Bola tam zmluva ACTA (prerokovaná na Výbore pre občianske slobody, spravodlivosť a vnútorné záležitosti, pozn.).
Flašíková-Benová (SMER-SD) vs Kukan (SDKÚ-DS) - 16.05.2014
ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) je voľne prekladaná ako Obchodná dohoda o boji proti falšovaniu. Je pravdou, že sa prejednávala aj na Výbore pre občianske slobody, spravodlivosť a vnútorné záležitosti (LIBA), 5. júna 2012 vydal k dohode EP tlačovú správu, kde sa píše:
Civil Liberties Committee
ACTA does not comply with the rights enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the International Trade Committee should "recommend that Parliament declines to consent to the conclusion" of this agreement, says the Civil Liberties Committee in its opinion, which was adopted by 36 votes to one, with 21 abstentions. Civil Liberties MEPs point out that Europe needs an international agreement to step up the fight against counterfeiting, but all deals concluded by the EU must be compatible with its treaties and ACTA does not ensure full respect for private life or full protection of sensitive personal information. The text also stresses that when fundamental rights are at sake ambiguity must be avoided and ACTA entails various layers of ambiguity.Internet providers should not police the Internet, says this committee, urging the Commission and EU countries to ensure that the role of providers is legally clear. It also calls for an EU strategy to combat counterfeiting and piracy, which must fully respect fundamental rights in Europe.
Výslednú správu (.pdf) vydal aj samotný Výbor pre občianske slobody, spravodlivosť a vnútorné záležitosti:
ACTA does not comply with the rights enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the International Trade Committee should "recommend that Parliament declines to consent to the conclusion" of this agreement, says the Civil Liberties Committee in its opinion, which was adopted by 36 votes to one, with 21 abstentions. Civil Liberties MEPs point out that Europe needs an international agreement to step up the fight against counterfeiting, but all deals concluded by the EU must be compatible with its treaties and ACTA does not ensure full respect for private life or full protection of sensitive personal information. The text also stresses that when fundamental rights are at sake ambiguity must be avoided and ACTA entails various layers of ambiguity.Internet providers should not police the Internet, says this committee, urging the Commission and EU countries to ensure that the role of providers is legally clear. It also calls for an EU strategy to combat counterfeiting and piracy, which must fully respect fundamental rights in Europe.
Výslednú správu (.pdf) vydal aj samotný Výbor pre občianske slobody, spravodlivosť a vnútorné záležitosti:
"V tomto zmysle je spravodajca presvedčený, že dohoda ACTA prichádza veľmi predčasne a prípadné prijatie tejto dohody by v zásade zamedzilo možnosti viesť verejnú diskusiu hodnú nášho demokratického dedičstva. Spravodajca je súčasne presvedčený, že prijatie dohody ACTA by predčasne umlčalo diskusiu a vychýlilo nevyhnutnú rovnováhu jedným smerom a umožnilo by členským štátom experimentovať so zákonmi, ktoré by mohli potenciálne ohroziť základné slobody a zaviesť precedens, ktorý by bol nežiaduci pre budúce spoločnosti."
Dátum zverejnenia analýzy: 13.05.2014